Students present their presentations, posters and videos, collect and analyze the feedback
The type of criteria | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Content | Whole set out the information, a deep study of the sources, there are no gaps in the material | Integrally provided information, the data is qualitatively treated; there are small gaps in the presented material | Patchy, poorly processed data; there are gaps in the presented material | Fragmentary information, raw data, a large number of gaps in the presented material |
The structure of the plan | The plan is convenient for operation and doesn’t have any flaws in the construction of the question | The plan is correctly structured | The plan has errors or omissions | The plan is wrong or missing |
The timing of the project | The implementation of the plan ahead of schedule | Implementation of the plan in time | Implementation of the plan with a slight delay | Implementation of the plan with a long delay or the failure of the project |
Team work and its effectiveness | Perfect team work and dedication of each participants | Good team work and participation of each student in the project | In general, the successful work of the team, but not all students were participated | Not all students participated in the project, or the project was prepared only by a part of the group |
Critical thinking | All reasoning is short, clear, understandable and easy to repeat | All reasoning are clear and understandable | Some difficult with reasoning, but they are satisfactory to understand | Reasoning is unclear and have many mistakes |
Problem solving | The group revealed the theme of the project in full, almost without encountering difficulties | The group has managed to disclose the topic of the project and resolve issues | The group spent a significant amount of time, but deal with the problems of the project | The group was lost before the arisen problems and was unable to solve them |
Protection of project results | Using of unusual and correctly made ways of the project’s presentation | The use of traditional ways of presenting material with good theoretical and practical base | The use of traditional ways of presenting material with satisfactory theoretical and practical base | Weak theoretical and practical base or the project is not ready to defend |