Rubric for the website

Criteria

Excellent

Satisfactory

Poor

Organization and design

Layout and design

There are multiple graphic elements and variation in layout. Design elements assist visitors in understanding concepts and ideas.

There are some graphic elements and limited variation in layout. Design elements sometimes assist visitors in understanding concepts and ideas.

There are few or no graphic elements, no variation in layout and/or the colors and text interfere with the readability.

Navigation

The site is well-organized and easy to navigate. Visitors can clearly understand where they are and where to go next.

Some navigation is unclear, resulting in a few places where visitors can become lost.

Navigating the site is confusing and information cannot be found easily.

Personal information

Page identifies the author (university, college, profile picture) and contact information for the person responsible for the page.

Page identifies the author (university, college) There is no personal picture, and contact information for the person responsible for the page.

There is no information about person.

Content

Materials

The presence of all assigned tasks(Essential question, Comments on poster, plan for project, checklist, rubric, the roles of the teacher and students during the project, rubric for evaluating the website.).

Not all assigned tasks are present at the website.

There are no materials at the website.

Gallery

There are photos of all assigned works in the gallery (brochure, business card wallpaper, booklets)

There are only a few photos in the gallery.

There are no photos in the gallery.

Execution

Accuracy

There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.

There are some grammar and spelling mistakes.

There are a lot of grammar and spelling mistakes.

Concept

The website has a very strong, clear visual concept that relates to the project goals

The website has somewhat of a clear visual concept but does not relate to the project goals

The website has no clear visual concept and does not relate to the project goals