СДЕЛАЙТЕ СВОИ УРОКИ ЕЩЁ ЭФФЕКТИВНЕЕ, А ЖИЗНЬ СВОБОДНЕЕ

Благодаря готовым учебным материалам для работы в классе и дистанционно

Скидки до 50 % на комплекты
только до

Готовые ключевые этапы урока всегда будут у вас под рукой

Организационный момент

Проверка знаний

Объяснение материала

Закрепление изученного

Итоги урока

Peer assessment

Нажмите, чтобы узнать подробности

peer assessment of project

Просмотр содержимого документа
«Peer assessment»

Peer-assessment.

I evaluated Project Plan from 32 EK. Here I used some rubrics for assessment

Student: Aknur

Essential question: Can the puppet finger fairy tale develop knowledge of direct and indirect speech?

Grade: 5-6

Level: lower pre-intermediate



Criteria

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Topic

The school topic is interesting to children. It supports the curriculum and is multifaceted enough to warrant deep study.

The school topic is interesting to students. The topic supports the curriculum and is not enough multifaceted to warrant deep study

The school topic holds some interest for students, peripherally relates to curriculum, and lends itself to superficial study. The topic is too narrow or lacks focus to justify deep study.

The structure of the plan

Our plan has well intended, detailed instructions and procedures that make the unit easy to apply. The plan meets all requirements . The plan includes additional information which explains the essence of a topic.

Plan has instructions and procedures, but some areas are unclear, making application difficult. The plan includes enough information that explains the essence of a topic.

Plan lacks clarity and is not an effective guide for application.

Procedures: student work

The work that they created at the end is genuine, meaningful and resembles the kinds of work that people do in real life.

The work that they created at the end makes sense and the basic elements that you can use in real life

The work does not resemble authentic work in a discipline in any way.



80/100

Comments: I think the plan for this project might be interesting for the kids, but the plan doesn't have a concrete result to improve the students ' knowledge.













Peer-assessment.

I evaluated Project Plan from 31 EK. Here I used some rubrics for assessment.

Using fairytales for comprehending sequences of tenses

Students: Alina and Ayagoz

Grade: 8

Level: pre-intermediate

Description: Students write a scenario of the own fairytale  and film it

 

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Clearful objectives


The objectives describe specific knowledge, and/or

products that relate to

standards and can be

assessed and

understood at a deep

level, where relevant

unit concepts are

applied.


The objectives describe specific knowledge, and/or products that meet standards and reflect understanding of relevant unit concepts.

The objectives describe behaviors, knowledge, and/or products that are rather vague and only require superficial understanding of unit concepts.

Content

Creative uses of technology are promoted. There is a clear space for pupils’ initiative and autonomous work. All information are given how children work with project

The content is not fully disclosed . Small grammatical errors are restrained. Information about what children should do with the project is not sufficiently explained

The use of technological means is not planned

Recourses

The plan provides resources on the topic. Accordingly, resources can understand the content

The plan provides resources on the topic. All resources are not relevant to the theme

Project has no resources listed.



80/100