| Category | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Poor |
| Organization and Design | There are multiple graphic elements and variation in layout. Design elements assist visitors in understanding concepts and ideas. (postcards) | There are some graphic elements and limited variation in layout. Design elements sometimes assist visitors in understanding concepts and ideas. (postcards) | There are few or no graphic elements, no variation in layout and/or the colors and text interfere with the readability. (postcards) | The organization has not done well, postcards and other published materials are not readable. |
| Identification | Page identifies the author (university, college, department, program center or individual) and contact information for the person. | Page identifies the author (university, college, department, program center or individual) partly and contact information for the person. | page doesn’t identify the author’s personality. There is just general information. | There is no information about person. |
| Content (Materials) | All materials (are published) in a page are clear. There are no grammatical mistakes. They have only main and important information connected with the EQ and project. | All materials(are published) in a page are clear. There are 1-2 grammatical mistakes. They have only important information connected with the EQ and project. | Materials in a page are not clear. Lack of materials. They are not interconnected. There are more than 4 grammar mistakes. It includes the different aspects for the EQ and plan. | Just 1 or 2 materials have been published, they are not clear. The explanations are given incorrectly. |
| Blog | Very often visits blog and writes about project. Shares opinion about questions. Publishes all necessary photographs with comments. | Often visits blog and writes about project. Rarely shares opinion about questions. Publishes necessary photographs with comments. | Rarely visits blog and doesn’t write about project. Doesn’t share opinion about project and the EQ. There is no photographs. | Never visits and write blog. |
| Gallery | There are all 14 photos of postcards. | There are only 10 photos of postcards. | There are only 2 or 3 photos of postcards. | There are no photos. |
| Tasks | All tasks have been done due deadline. | Tasks have been done but 1 or 2 were late. | All tasks haven’t been done due deadline. Always late. | Tasks haven’t been done. |
| Peer-Assessment | Student could evaluate other’s works because there are published photos of assessments and notes in blog with all needed criteria. | Student could evaluate other’s works because there are published photos of assessments. Some of them with comments. | Student could not evaluate other’s works because there are not published photos of assessments. But there are comments for the work. | Student evaluated nobody. |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
329
126 867 
