Assessment (Making brochure)

Category

Excellent

5

Good

4

Satisfactory

3

Needs improvement

2

Score:

Pictures and

layout:

Organized and

easy to read

Content was well

organized with

headings and

subheadings. Text

and graphics were

neatly organized

and made the

project easy to read.

Project was

organized with

headings and

subheadings. Text

and graphics were

placed to make the

project easy to read.

Most of the project

was organized. The

placement of text

and graphics

sometimes made

the project hard to

read.

Project was hard to

read. There is no

clear structure.

Text and graphics

were randomly

placed.

Info is correct and

has many details:

Topic and length

Topic was

completely

addressed.

Statements were

clearly supported

by many facts and

detailed examples.

All content is

accurate

Topic was

addressed. Most

statements were

supported by facts

and examples.

Most content is

accurate.

Topic was

addressed. Some

statements were

supported by facts

and examples.

Some content is

accurate.

Topic was not

addressed.

Statements were

not supported by

facts or examples.

Most content is not

accurate.

Spelling,

grammar is

correct:

Correct spelling,

grammar,

punctuation, usage

No spelling,

grammar,

capitalization or

punctuation errors.

Sentences are all

well-formed.

Fewer than 5

spelling and

grammar errors.

Fewer than 5

capitalization and

punctuation errors.

One or two flawed

sentences.

More than 5

spelling and

grammar errors.

More than 5

capitalization and

punctuation errors.

Less than 5

sentences show

flawed structure.

More than 10

spelling and

grammar errors.

More than 10

capitalization and

punctuation errors.

Many sentences

show flawed

structure.

creativity, used

charts, graphs,

punnet squares,

etc.:

Unique delivery

Project

demonstrated

student\'s own

interpretation and

expression of

research material.

Used graphs,

charts, or other

visual aids to

display information

in multiple ways.

Used student created

materials

as well as existing

material from other

sources. Student

devised a creative

way to design or

deliver the project.

Information was

factual but showed

little student

interpretation.

Project based

primarily on sample

work. Student

added one or more

original ideas.

Project was built

from a template,

designed only as

prescribed, or was

based entirely on

sample work.