Миф об Атлантиде и Гиперборее

Заметка в "Atlantipedia": "Sergey Teleguin is a Russian professor of Philology and a leading advocate of the idea that the city of Tripura (Triple City) in Vedic tradition was the original inspiration behind Plato’s city of Atlantis. In support of his contention he has outlined a number of parallels between Plato’s account and the sacred texts of India, the /Puranas/ and /Mahabharata in an extensive English excerpt from his 2005 Russian book, Anatomy of a Myth. A further claim by Teleguin is that the /Popol Vuh, /the sacred book of the Maya gives clears evidence that they came from the far north – Ultima Thule. He goes further and attributes a North Pole origin to both the Maya and the Indo-Europeans. He has recently outlined his ideas further in an article for (Nov/Dec 2013) Issue 102 of /Atlantis Rising/ magazine. He recently reiterated, in an email, his view that Plato’s Atlantis story should only be accepted literally or not at all. It is difficult to accept that an academic could write such nonsense. He cannot be unaware that Plato’s narrative is composed of mythology, history andwithin the bounds of literary licence, some embellishment of his own. Otherwise, according to Teleguin, we are expected to believe that Clieto actually gave birth to five sets of male twins, that Athens fought a war before it existed and that Poseidon and Atlas were real people! The same absence of critical thinking allows people to believe that the world was created in seven days.

^(a) Sergey Teleguin: Atlantis — Vedic Tripura | * ? / ATLANTIDA * (primordial.org.ua) <http://atlantida.primordial.org.ua/archives/251> *

^(b) A NEW STUDY AS TO WHERE THE MAYANS CAME FROM (archive.org) <https://web.archive.org/web/20241004020336/https:// mayanarchaeology.tripod.com/id23.html>* *

Подтверждаю свою позицию: Атлантида могла существовать только там (в Атлантическом океане) и тогда (10 тыс. лет назад), как об этом говорится в диалогах Платона. Близнецы Клейто и семь дней творения - это вообще из другой оперы. Такой комментарий к моим тезисам - просто жалкое передергивание. Любопытно другое: для чего? Зачем обязательно нужно убедить всех, что Атлантида - это только выдумка Платона, полная приукрашиваний? Сама по себе гневная реакция говорит о том, что я наступил на больной палец, и это лишь подтверждает мою правоту. Ну какие же мы все прям-таки нежные!