Project planning rubric

The type of criteria

5

4

3

2

Content

Whole set out the information,

a deep study of the sources, there are no gaps in the material

Integrally provided information, the data is qualitatively treated; there are small gaps in the presented material

Patchy, poorly processed data; there are gaps in the presented material

Fragmentary information, raw data, a large number of gaps in the presented material

The structure of the plan

The plan is convenient for operation and doesn’t have any flaws in the construction of the question

The plan is correctly structured

The plan has errors or omissions

The plan is wrong or missing

The timing of the project

The implementation of the plan ahead of schedule

Implementation of the plan in time

Implementation of the plan with a slight delay

Implementation of the plan with a long delay or the failure of the project

Team work and its effectiveness

Perfect team work and dedication of each participants

Good team work and participation of each student in the project

In general, the successful work of the team, but not all students were participated

Not all students participated in the project, or the project was prepared only by a part of the group

Critical thinking

All reasoning is short, clear, understandable and easy to repeat

All reasoning are clear and understandable

Some difficult with reasoning, but they are satisfactory to understand

Reasoning is unclear and have many mistakes

Problem solving

The group revealed the theme of the project in full, almost without encountering difficulties

The group has managed to disclose the topic of the project and resolve issues

The group spent a significant amount of time, but deal with the problems of the project

The group was lost before the arisen problems and was unable to solve them

Protection of project results

Using of unusual and correctly made ways of the project’s presentation

The use of traditional ways of presenting material with good theoretical and practical base

The use of traditional ways of presenting material with satisfactory theoretical and practical base

Weak theoretical and practical base or the project is not ready to defend