СДЕЛАЙТЕ СВОИ УРОКИ ЕЩЁ ЭФФЕКТИВНЕЕ, А ЖИЗНЬ СВОБОДНЕЕ
Благодаря готовым учебным материалам для работы в классе и дистанционно
Скидки до 50 % на комплекты
только до
Готовые ключевые этапы урока всегда будут у вас под рукой
Организационный момент
Проверка знаний
Объяснение материала
Закрепление изученного
Итоги урока
“Poems are music in words”
Zhanar Kabulova and Nargiz Rabatova 34 ER
Grade: 7
Level: pre-intermediate
Subjects: English, Literature, Information technologies
Product: mini-book with exercises basis on poems
Rubrics for project plan
Criteria |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
Total |
||
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
||||
The EQ |
It is open-ended,complex, coherent, provocative and authentic. |
The driving question serves as a guide to the direction of inquiry and products for the project. |
The driving question is neither too open-ended nor too concrete. |
The driving question is not appropriate to the content outcomes for the project. |
|||
Product |
Product is creative, innovative and appropriate for level of students |
Product is creative, but it is hard for application. |
Product is not innovative. |
Product is not understanding and not appropriate for level of students |
|||
Content |
Ideas connected by original transitions, logical throughout. There are no errors in grammar and punctuation. |
The way of the work is not connected logically. There are problems with some punctuations |
Ideas are not connected structuraly. There are problems with grammar and punctuation |
Important ideas were not supported with references. There were more than 3 errors in grammar. |
|||
Organization |
Information is clearly focused in an organization and illustrate the main points |
Information supports the solution to the challenge or question |
Information loosely supports the solution |
Information does not supports the solution to the challenge or question |
|||
Aims |
The stated aims describe a good understanding of learning outcomes |
Most of the stated aims are developed and describe a good understanding of learning outcomes |
Several goal statements are partially developed and it is difficult to determine what learning outcomes/concepts are expected |
No discipline specific goal statements |
|||
Objectives |
Objectives describe specific behaviors, knowledge, and product that relate to standards and can be assessed. Objectives require deep understanding and focus primarily on meeting curricular goals. |
Objectives describe specific behaviors, knowledge, and product that meet standards and reflect understanding of relevant unit concepts. |
Objectives describe behaviors, knowledge, and product that are rather indefinite and only require superficial understanding of unit concepts. |
Objectives describe indefinite behaviors, knowledge, and product that do not require understanding of unit concepts. |
|||
The structure of the plan |
The plan is convenient for operation and doesn’t have any flaws in the construction of the question |
The plan is correctly structured |
The plan has errors or omissions |
The plan is wrong or missing |
|||
Timeline |
The plan has a complete timeline describing when different parts of the work will be done. |
The plan has outline on time and |
The plan has not complete timeline describing when most parts of the work will be done. |
The plan does not have a timeline |
|||
Resources |
Project utilizes at the least of 5 authoritative resources. |
Project utilizes at the least of 3-2 authoritative resources. |
Project relies heavily on one resource. |
Project has no resources listed. |
|||
Group Timeline |
Group independently develops a reasonable, complete timeline describing when different parts of the work will be done. |
Group independently develops a timeline describing when most parts of the work will be done. |
|
Group needs adult help to develop a timeline. |
|||
Delegation of Responsibility |
Each student in the group can clearly explain what information s/he is responsible for locating. |
Each student in the group can, with minimal prompting from peers, clearly explain what information s/he is responsible for locating. |
One or more students in the group cannot clearly explain what information they are responsible for locating. |
Nobody in the group cannot clearly explain what information they are responsible for locating. |
|||
Technology |
Creative uses of technology are promoted. |
Tools planned are tailored to the activities and objectives, as well as the age of the pupils, who will use them regularly. |
The use of basic tools tailored to the activities and objectives is planned, but it will mostly be teachers that employ them |
The use of technological tools is not planned |
|||
Implementation of the 21st century skills |
There are strong implementation of the 21st century skill on every stage of project plan |
There are few 21st century skills implemented in the project plan |
The lack of the realization of the 21st skills during the plan |
The 21st century skills are not included |
|||
Creativity & Critical Thinking |
Appears innovative or exciting, or has unusual appeal to audience. |
Shows evidence of prototypes or drafts that lead to higher quality work. |
Shows evidence of haste or lack of effort. |
Does not demonstrate precision, care, or sense of pride. |
|||
Collaboration |
Team members clearly understand each member’s knowledge and expertise, and effectively utilize each member’s skill set. |
Team members are aware of each member’s knowledge and expertise but do not effectively utilize each member’s skill set. |
Team members understand each other, but can not specify tasks for every team’s member. Team does not considering contingency plans. |
Team members do not understand each other and do not want to work together. |
|||
Problem solving |
The group revealed the theme of the project in full, almost without encountering difficulties |
The group has managed to disclose the topic of the project and resolve issues |
The group spent a significant amount of time, but deal with the problems of the project |
The group was lost before the arisen problems and was unable to solve them |
|||
Accuracy of speech |
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words. |
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word. |
Speaks clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word. |
Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word. |
|||
Presenting of project results |
Using unusual way of presenting the project |
Using traditional way for presenting project |
Have problems with theoretical and practical base |
Do not ready for presenting project |
Total:
References:
1.
2. Developing and Using Instructional Rubrics by Elizabeth Shellard, - 2004
3. How To Create A Rubric That Does What You Want It To by Grant Wiggins - 2017
© 2018, Kabulova Zhanar Shokanovna 221