СДЕЛАЙТЕ СВОИ УРОКИ ЕЩЁ ЭФФЕКТИВНЕЕ, А ЖИЗНЬ СВОБОДНЕЕ
Благодаря готовым учебным материалам для работы в классе и дистанционно
Скидки до 50 % на комплекты
только до
Готовые ключевые этапы урока всегда будут у вас под рукой
Организационный момент
Проверка знаний
Объяснение материала
Закрепление изученного
Итоги урока
|
CATEGORY |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
Essential Question |
Essential question is thoughtful, creative, well-worded and specific and corresponds to all three levels required for crafting essential question. |
Essential question is well-worded, specific and corresponds to two levels required for crafting essential question. |
Essential question lacked focus, poorly stated, and corresponds to one level required for crafting essential question. |
Essential question lacked a specific focus, poorly stated, and does not correspond to the levels required for crafting essential question. |
|
Objectives |
Objectives describe specific knowledge, and/or products that relate to standards and can be assessed and understood at a deep level, where relevant unit concepts are applied. |
Objectives describe specific knowledge, and/or products that meet standards and reflect understanding of relevant unit concepts. |
Objectives describe knowledge, and/or products that are rather obscure and only require superficial understanding of unit concepts. |
Objectives describe obscure knowledge and/or products that do not require understanding of unit concepts. |
|
Content |
Content is very informative, meaningful, intriguing and corresponds to real-world situations. It is interesting to implement. |
Content is informative, meaningful and corresponds to real-world situations and is worth implementing. |
Content is not always informative, but corresponds to real-world situations. It can be implemented. |
Content is not informative, meaningful and do not corresponds to real-world situations. It cannot be implemented. |
|
Authenticity |
The project has an authentic context, involves real-world tasks, tools, and quality standards, makes a real impact on the world, speaks to students’ personal concerns, interests, or identities. |
The project has an authentic context, involves some real-world tasks, tools, and quality standards, makes some impact on the world. |
The project has some authentic features, but they may be limited or feel contrived. |
The project lacks a real-world context, tasks and tools, does not make a real impact on the world or speak to students’ personal interests. |
|
Time management |
Always uses time well throughout the project to ensure timely production. Group does not have to adjust deadlines or responsibilities due to group member’s procrastination. |
Usually uses time well throughout the project. May have procrastinated at times. Group does not have to adjust deadlines or responsibilities due to group member’s procrastination. |
Always gets things done by deadlines. Group does not have to adjust deadlines or responsibilities due to group member’s procrastination. |
Rarely gets things done by deadlines and/or group has to adjust deadlines or responsibilities because of group member’s inadequate time management. |
|
Selection of Sources |
Student identified highly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, tion electronic sources). All borrowed text material and graphics have a source citation. |
Student identified mostly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). Some borrowed text material and graphics have a source citation. |
Student identified a few appropriate sources but made little attempt to balance format types. One or two borrowed text material and graphics have a source citation. |
Student Identified no appropriate sources in any format. Several borrowed text material and graphics do not have a source citation. |
|
Attractiveness |
The project is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. |
The project is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness. |
The project is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy. |
The project is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive. |
|
Demonstration of critical thinking |
Student was able to openly discuss topics and demonstrated critical thinking related to the ongoing investigation. |
Student was able to answer most questions posed and demonstrated critical thinking about those concepts. |
Student was able to answer all questions posed but demonstrated very little critical hinking. |
Student was unable to answer questions posed. |
|
Presentation |
Includes everything required in presentation, presents ideas in meaningful order |
Includes most of the information required in presentation, ideas presented in an order, but it does not always make sense |
Includes some of the information required in presentation, ideas not always in an order and it does not always make sense |
Includes a little required in presentation, presents ideas in an order that does not make sense |
© 2017, Tarkhanova Oxana Alexandrovna 410