© 2017 333
СДЕЛАЙТЕ СВОИ УРОКИ ЕЩЁ ЭФФЕКТИВНЕЕ, А ЖИЗНЬ СВОБОДНЕЕ
Благодаря готовым учебным материалам для работы в классе и дистанционно
Скидки до 50 % на комплекты
только до
Готовые ключевые этапы урока всегда будут у вас под рукой
Организационный момент
Проверка знаний
Объяснение материала
Закрепление изученного
Итоги урока
Rubrics for website evaluation
Criteria |
Excellent “5” |
Good “4” |
Poor “3” |
Content |
Website is very informative. There are all of the tasks and some other educational files for students |
All of the tasks are presented on the website but there is no additional educational files |
Website provided only 1 or 2 tasks and there is no any additional educational files |
Spelling and Grammar |
There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar. The site contains excellent sentence structure and word use |
There are minimal errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar and the reader is not distracted by these errors |
There are many errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar, making it challenging for the reader to get through the pages |
Website design |
—font, and color was very memorable and highly interactive —website contains personal photographs and avatar —name of the website’s author is indicated on the page — website contains full range of information concerning the explanation of the choice to become a teacher |
—Website contains minimum of information about the author of the page and his/her explanation of the choice to become a teacher —There’s an avatar, but the website doesn’t contain personal photographs —information is not organized in a readable format |
—There’s a lack of the website’s owner information —the explanation of choice to become a teacher is not sufficient —There is no any personal photographs or avatar —Colors and fonts make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader. |
Interest |
The author of the website has made the content of the website interesting and helpful to the readers, so the website has a large number of followers among by teachers and teacher-trainees |
The author of the website has tried to make the content of the site interesting to the readers, but only part of the data is helpful and |
The author of the website has not created valuable content and the maximum number of followers is 1-2 |
Evaluation of the website
Name: Yuliya Bondarenko (33 ER) Evaluated by : Aisha Dosmagambetova (34 ER)
Criteria |
Excellent “5” |
Good “4” |
Poor “3” |
Content |
|
|
|
Spelling and Grammar |
|
|
|
Website design |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Total: 19
© 2017 333